Main Article Content
In this paper we describe the use of LEGO® models within assessment of the Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice (PGCAP) offered at the University of Salford. Within the context of the PGCAP, we model innovative and contextualised assessment strategies for and of learning. We challenge our students, who are teachers in higher education (HE), to think and rethink the assessment they are using with their own students. We help them develop a deeper understanding and experience of good assessment and feedback practice in a wider context while they are assessed as students on the PGCAP. We report on an evaluation of how the LEGO® model activity was used with a cohort of students in the context of the professional discussion assessment. We share the impact it had on reflection and the assessment experience and make recommendations for good practice.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Brown, S. (2010). Play. How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. London: Avery Penguin.
Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. Oxon: Routledge.
Clews, D. (2003). Imaging in education: Imaging in preliminary-level studio design technology projects. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 2(1), pp. 7–28.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.
Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations. New approaches to identities and audiences. Oxon: Routledge.
Gauntlett, D. (2011) Making is connecting. The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web2.0. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hallgrimsson, B. (2012). Prototyping and modelmaking for product design. London: Laurence King Publishing.
Jensen, H. (2012). Using LEGO: play and reflection (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aalborg University, Copenhagen
Lange, S. (2010). Learning through creative conversations. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. Holtham (Eds.), Teaching creativity – Creativity in teaching (pp. 173–187). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.
LEGO® Education. (2010). A system for learning. LEGO® Education and LEGO® Learning Institute. Available from http://education.lego.com/en-us/about-us/
Meistre, B., &Belluigi, D. (2010). After image: Using metaphoric storytelling in the evaluation of a fine art photography course. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & C. Holtham (Eds.), Teaching creativity – Creativity in teaching (pp. 155–171). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.
Moon, J. (2010). Using Story: in higher education and professional development. Oxon: Routledge.
Moran, A., & Dallat, J. (1995). Promoting reflective practice in initial teacher training. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(5), pp. 20–26.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert &I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood: Ablex Publishing. Retrieved from: http://www.papert.org/articles/SituatingConstructionism.html
Piaget, J. (1980). Conversations with Jean Piaget, interviews by Jean-Claude Bringuier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, C., & Nerantzi, C. (2013). ePortfolios: Assessment as learning using social media. In Miller, D. & Volk, B. (Eds.) E-Portfolios an der Schnittstelle von Studium und Beruf, Medien in der Wissenschaft. Münster: Waxmann Verlag, pp. 147–166.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research. Studying how things work. London: The Guilford Press.
The Higher Education Academy, (2012). A marked improvement. Transforming assessment in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/assessment/A_Marked_Improvement.pdf