Main Article Content
As a statement of fact, the Higher Education (HE) sector gathers data. Commonly these data are metrical in format, used in some way to report on some aspect of performativity, whether within the institution or beyond its bounds. This paper does not seek to dispute the need for measurement, but it does argue the limitations of metric-based proxies alone if we are to truly understand the space of the university and how it operates in the interests of students, staff, employers, government and all other stakeholders. Our interest in the limitation of metrics in the HE context inspired a study funded by QAA (Scotland). The study focused on capturing, evidencing and affirming intangible elements of HE that are not easily counted or quantified, but form key aspects of an institution’s identity, culture and ethos, described by us as intangible assets.
This brief paper provides an overview of our study and its outcomes to date. In presenting our progress and conceptual framework, we are inviting reflection, constructive comment and further dialogue in respect of the model itself, and its helpfulness in re-prioritising qualitative data in our assessment of our assets in higher education.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Freitas, R. (2016). Cultural mapping as a developmental tool. City, Culture and Society. 7 (1) 9 – 16.
Jeannotte, M.S. (2016). Story-telling about place: engaging citizens in cultural mapping. City, Culture and Society. 7 (1) 35 – 41
Longley, A., Duxbury, N. (2016). Introduction: Mapping Cultural Intangibles. City, Culture and Society. 7 (1) 1- 7.
Robertson, A. (2018). Teaching quality - a sticky wicked problem? https://wonkhe.com/blogs/teaching-quality-a-sticky-wicked-problem/
Robertson, A., Cleaver, E., Smart, F. (2019). Beyond the metrics: Identifying, evidencing and enhancing the less tangible assets of higher education. QAA (Scotland) https://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/current-enhancement-theme/defining-and-capturing-evidence/the-intangibles-beyond-the-metrics
Smart, F., Robertson, A., Cleaver, E. (2019). Navigating the McNamara Trap. https://www.invisiblegrail.com/blog/navigating-the-mcnamara-trap/
Sutton, P. (2017). Lost souls? The demoralization of academic labour in the measured university. Higher Education Research & Development. 36 (3) 625-636.
Watson, D. (2000) Managing in Higher Education: ‘the Wicked Issues’. Higher Education Quarterly. 54 (1) pp.5-21.