From criminology to gerontology: case studies of experiential authenticity in higher education

Main Article Content

Suzanne Young Ellen Tullo, Dr

Abstract

This article discusses two examples of higher education teaching interventions with evidence of high levels of student engagement resulting from experiential authenticity – the Prison: Learning Together module and an intergenerational module about ageing (NUAGE). The article outlines the aims and objectives of the two programmes and discusses the core findings from the module evaluations. The findings demonstrate that creating communities of practice using experiential authenticity enhances the learning journey for students, resulting in greater participation. Experiential authenticity has been identified as distinct from other forms of experiential learning with common features thought to result in sustained student engagement included collaboration with peers, an authentic experience of working with learners from outside the university, and reciprocal respect between members of diverse groups. We make suggestions as to how these engagement themes could be applied to other higher education settings whilst acknowledging the challenges involved.

Article Details

Section
Case Studies
Author Biography

Ellen Tullo, Dr, Newcastle University

Dr Ellen Tullo is a lecturer in Ageing Education at Newcastle University and a practicing geriatrician.

References

Baron, P. & L. Corbin. 2012. Student Engagement: Rhetoric and Reality. Higher Education Research & Development 31 (6): 759–772.
Cronley, C., Madden, E. & Davis, J.B. (2015) ‘Making Service-Learning Partnerships Work: Listening and Responding to Community Partners’, Journal of Community Practice 23(2): 274-289.
Davies, P. (2000) ‘Doing Interviews with Female Offenders’ in Jupp, V., Davies, P. and Francis, P. (eds.) Doing Criminological Research. London, Sage pp 84-98.
Davis, H.A., Summers, J.J. &Miller, L.M. (2012) An Interpersonal Approach to Classroom Management: Strategies for Improving Student Engagement. London, Sage.
Gokhale, A. (1995) ‘Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking’, Journal of Technology Education 7: 22-30.
Herrington, T. & Herrington, J. (2006) Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education. London, Information Science Publishing.
Jonassen, D. (1999) ‘Designing Constructivist Learning Environments’ in Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed) Instructional-Design: Theories and Models Volume II pp. 215-240.
Kahu, E (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education 38:5, 758-73
Koblar, S., Cranwell, M., Koblar, S., Carnell, B. & Galletly, C. (2018). Developing Empathy: Does Experience Through Simulation Improve Medical-Student Empathy? Med Sci Educ, 28 (1): 31-36
Laal, M. & Ghodsi, S.M. (2012) ‘Benefits of Collaborative Learning’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 (2012): 486 – 490.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Lombardi M. (2007) Authentic Learning for The 21st Century: An Overview. Educause Learning Initiative, ELI Paper 1/2007. Available at: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3009.pdf (last accessed 4th April 2016).
Madden, S. (Ed) (2000) Service Learning Across the Curriculum. Lanham, University Press of America.
Miller, J. & Glassner, B. (1997) ‘The Inside and Outside: Finding Realities in Interviews’ in Sliverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London, Sage Publications pp 99-112.
Nichols, H. (2018) ‘Higher Education in High Security: Meaningful Education Experiences In The Absence Of Learning Technologies’, Advancing Corrections Journal 6: 70-80.
Qureshi S., Jones H., Adamson J. & Ogundipe, O.A. (2017). Ageing simulation for promoting empathy in medical students. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning; 3:79-81.
Sadler, I. (2012) ‘The Challenges for Academics in Adopting Student-Centred Approaches to Teaching’, Studies in Higher Education, 37(6): 731-745.
Scheuermann, J.A. (2018) ‘Group vs. Collaborative Learning: Knowing the Difference Makes a Difference’, Faculty Focus 5th February 2018. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/course-design-ideas/group-vs-collaborative-learning-knowing-difference-makes-difference/ Accessed 20/11/2018.
Tinto, V. (2003) ‘Learning Better Together: The Impact of Learning Communities on Student Success’, Higher Education Monograph Series, 2003-1, Higher Education Program, School of Education, Syracuse University.
Trowler V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: The Higher Education Academy
Tullo, E., Greaves, G., & Wakeling, L. (2016). Involving older people in the design, development and delivery of an innovative module on aging for undergraduate students. Educ Gerontol DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2016.1218705.
Tullo, E., Wakeling, L., & Pearse, R. (2018). What is the impact of participating in an intergenerational module on the expectations regarding aging of undergraduate students? In: GSA 2018 Annual Scientific Meeting. 2018, Boston, MA: Gerontological Society of America.
Tullo, E., Elliott, A., & Wakeling, L. (2019). Impacts on Older People Contributing to an Intergenerational Course about Aging. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships 17(3): 327-39 https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2018.1535354
Wenger, E. (1999) Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voice. https://www.voice-global.org/ (Accessed Nov 2018)
Young, S. (2018) An Evaluation of the Leeds Beckett Prison: Learning Together Programme 2017. Prison Education Trust. https://www.prisonerseducation.org.uk/data/Prison%20Learning%20Together%20Evaluation%20Full%20report.pdf (Accessed 19/11/2018)
Young, S. & Nichols, H. (2017) ‘A Reflexive Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning’, Research in Learning Technology, Vol 25.