How can we improve the final year dissertation? A consideration of ethics, quality, and one-to-one supervision.

Main Article Content

Diarmuid Verrier Catherine Day

Abstract

The final year dissertation is seen across many degrees as a capstone achievement. It is set apart from other assessments in terms of its magnitude, its requirement for originality, and the autonomy that students must show in completing it. It is also unique in that it is traditionally carried out within the context of a one-to-one supervisory relationship. However, dissertation modules are prey to a number of problems. First, the person carrying out the research may have difficulty in framing a quality, or even a feasible, research question. Second, where dissertations are based on original empirical work, ethical concerns are particularly crucial, but the ability of the student-researcher to appropriately engage with those concerns is substantially less than that of a mature researcher. Third, support comes from a single source, but the supervisory relationship may be poor, or perceived as poor relative to the supervision experienced by peers. This case study describes a suite of changes that were made to one dissertation module to ameliorate these potential problems. Specifically, supervisors create project frameworks that students work within and the responsibility for getting ethical clearance for these is a supervisor’s responsibility. In addition, a substantial programme of specialised support sessions was created to supplement supervision. We argue that these changes did not significantly undermine the autonomy and originality requirements of the module, and present evidence that suggests they had a substantial positive impact on students’ learning experience and academic achievement. Ideas for further ways in which the dissertation module could be improved are discussed.

Article Details

Section
Case Studies

References

Abdulai, R., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2014). Essential Ingredients of a Good Research Proposal for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students in the Social Sciences. SAGE Open, 4(3), 1-15.
Bishop, D. (2013, July 26). Why we need pre-registration [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2013/07/why-we-need-pre-registration.html
British Psychological Society. (2017). Statement of Policy on Authorship and Publication Credit. Leicester, UK: Author.
British Psychological Society. (2016). Standards for the accreditation of undergraduate, conversion and integrated Masters programmes in psychology. Leicester, UK: Author.
Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Mokryscz, C. et al. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.
Button, K., Lawrence, N., Chambers, C., & Munafo, M. (2016). Instilling scientific rigor at the grassroots: Consortium-based undergraduate psychology projects. The Psychologist, 29 (3), pp. 158-167.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, M.R. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-68.
Del Río, M., Díaz-Vázquez, R., & Maside Sanfiz, J. (2018). Satisfaction with the supervision of undergraduate dissertations. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 159-172.
Derounian, J. (2011). Shall We Dance? The Importance of Staff-Student Relationships to Undergraduate Dissertation Preparation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 91-100.
Devonport, T., & Lane, A. (2006). Cognitive appraisal of dissertation stress among undergraduate students. The Psychological Record, 56(2), 259-266.
Edwards, S. (2009). Student projects in medicine: A lesson in science and ethics. Accountability in Research, 16(6), 285-306.
Hack, C. J. (2012). Ethical review of undergraduate student research projects: A proportionate, transparent and efficient process? Bioscience Education, 19, 1-8.
Healey, M., Lannin, L., Stibbe, A., & Derounian, J. (2013). Developing and Enhancing Undergraduate Final-Year Projects and Dissertations. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
Hwang, A., Kessler, E., & Francesco, A. (2004). Student Networking Behavior, Culture, and Grade Performance: An Empirical Study and Pedagogical Recommendations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 139-150.
Landrum, R. E., & Harrold, R. (2003). What employers want from psychology graduates. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 131-133.
Nosek, B., Alter, G., Banks, G., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S., Breckler, S., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348, 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. (2010). Research-led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489236
Todd, M., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final‐year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 335-355.
Wiggins, S., Gordon-Finlayson, A., Becker, S., & Sullivan, C. (2015). Qualitative Undergraduate Project Supervision in Psychology: Current Practices and Support Needs of Supervisors Across North East England and Scotland. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13, 1-19.
Wood, C., Giles, D., & Percy, C. (2012). Your psychology project handbook: Becoming a researcher (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson.