Main Article Content
Most undergraduate students are still required to complete a project of some kind, often in their final year of study. However, levels of student satisfaction on project modules and student outcomes are subject to considerable variation. Project modules sometimes detract from rather than add value to the student experience. Published research in the sector focused on best practice in the supervision of undergraduate projects and dissertations is limited. Using a case study approach, this article considers recent academic staff development interventions focused on enhancing supervision practice from a series of workshops and webinars organised by the authors. The analysis draws from existing module evaluation data, an in-session e-voting tool and end of session written evaluations. It considers the nuances of undergraduate supervision, the challenges that stem from cultural differences between disciplines, and the kinds of challenges faced by students and their supervisors. It argues that supervision at UG level constitutes a separate and distinctive aspect of HE pedagogic practice, and involves inducting the student into a different and often ‘alien’ approach to learning. It provides what the authors hope are some useful reflections on practice and proposes opportunities for developing practice of supervision more widely within the sector at undergraduate level.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Brew, A. (2010) An Australian Perspective on Undergraduate Research, CUR Quarterly, Vol 31, No.1
Fung, D. (2017) A connected curriculum for higher education. London, UCL Press
Gibbs, G., Habeshaw, S. & Habeshaw, T. (1992) 53 Interesting ways to teach large classes. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
Greenbank, P., Penketh, C., Schofield, M. & Turjansky, A. (2008) The Undergraduate Dissertation: 'most likely you go your way and I'll go mine'. International Journal of Quality and Standards, 2 (6). pp. 139-162. ISSN 1753-9439
Healey, M. (2005) Linking Research and Teaching to Benefit Student Learning, in Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 29, No.2, pp183-201
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009) Undergraduate research and enquiry. York: HE Academy.
Healey, M., Lannin, L., Stibbe, A. & Derounian, J. (2013) Developing and enhancing undergraduate final-year projects and dissertations. York, HEA
Healey, M., Flint, A. & Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HEA
Healey, M., Jenkins, A. & Lea, J. (2014) Developing research-based curricula in college-based higher education. York: Higher Education Academy
Jenkins, A. & Healey, M. (2005) Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. York: The Higher Education Academy
Mayson, S. & Schapper, J. (2012) Constructing teaching and research relations from the top: An analysis of senior manager discourses on research-led teaching. Higher Education Vol.64, Issue 4, pp 473-487.
Neary, M. & Winn, J. (2009). The student as producer: reinventing the student experience in higher education. In: L Bell, H Stevenson and M Neary (eds). The future of higher education: policy, pedagogy and the student experience. London: Continuum.
Neary, M. (2010) ‘Student as producer; a pedagogy for the avant-garde?’ Learning Exchange, 1, 1
Rowley, J. & Slack, F. (2004) What is the future of undergraduate dissertations? Education and Training, Vol 46, Issue 4, pp 176-181
Wisker, G. (2012) The good supervisor: supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Palgrave research skills. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.