PeerWise as a Vehicle for Uncertainty-resolution to Enhance Student Learning

Main Article Content

Amanda Sykes John Hamer Helen Purchase

Abstract

Previous studies of contributing student pedagogies (CSPs) have shown gains for students through increased summative grade and demonstration of deeper levels of learning. Resolution activities have been postulated by Draper (2009) as another way of enhancing students’ learning. In this paper, we show examples of learning occurring through resolution activities for students in higher education using PeerWise, a CSP tool, and we describe this as uncertainty-resolution that enhances learning. We then suggest a model through which this, and all learning in PeerWise, might take place. Finally, we anticipate that evidence of uncertainty-resolution will be seen in other PeerWise repositories; if this is so, we suggest that other educators using PeerWise should encourage and enhance their students’ learning by facilitating uncertainty-enhanced learning within PeerWise, and more broadly in other CSP activities.

Article Details

Section
Original Research
Author Biographies

Amanda Sykes, University of Glasgow

Amanda Sykes is a Senior Academic and Digital Development Adviser in LEADS (Learning Enhancement and Academic Development Service) at the University of Glasgow. She gained her PhD in virology before moving to work in academic development.

John Hamer, University of Glasgow

John Hamer received his PhD in Computer Science from the University of Auckland in 1990, where he served as Senior Lecturer until 2010. He currently works as a commercial software developer, and has an honorary affiliation with the University of Glasgow.

Helen Purchase, University of Glasgow

Helen Purchase is a Senior Lecturer in Computing Science at the University of Glasgow. She started her interest in e-learning with a PhD in Intelligent Tutoring Systems at Cambridge University, and, together with John Hamer, runs the Aropä online peer-review system.

References

Bates, S., Galloway, R., & McBride, K. (2012). Student-generated content: Using PeerWise to enhance engagement and outcomes in introductory physics courses. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413:123-26. AIP Publishing.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680009

Bates, S., Galloway, R., Riise, J., & Homer. D. (2014). Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository. In Physical Review Physics Education Research 10(2).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020105

Bottomley, S, & Denny, P. (2011). A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(5), 352–61.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20526

Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 763–72. CHI ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470763

Denny, P., Hamer, J, Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008a). PeerWise. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing Education Research, 109–12.

Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H.. (2008b). PeerWise: Students Sharing Their Multiple Choice Questions. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 51–58.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1404520.1404526

Denny, P., Hanks, B., & Simon, B. (2010). Replication study of a student-collaborative self-testing web service in a U.S. setting. SIGCSE ’10 Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science, ACM New York, NY USA, 2010, 421-425.

Denny, P, Luxton-Reilly, A., & Hamer, J. (2008). The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education, 78, 69–74.

Draper, S. (2009). Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 285–93.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00920.x

Falchikov, N. (2004). Involving students in Assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 102–8.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102

Feeley, M, & Parris, J. (2012). An assessment of the PeerWise student-contributed question system’s impact on learning outcomes: evidence from a large enrollment political science course. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2144375. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2144375.

Fellenz, M. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 703–19.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227245

Galloway, K., & Burns, S. (2014). Doing it for themselves: students creating a high quality peer-learning environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00209A

Green, S, & Tang, K. (2013). PeerWise – experiences at University College London | PeerWise-Community.org. PeerWise-Community.org http://www.peerwise-community.org/2013/09/13/peerwise-experiences-at-university-college-london/.

Hamer, J, Cutts, Q., Jackova, J, Luxton-Reilly, A, McCartney, R, Purchase, H, Riedesel,, C., Saeli, M, Sanders, K., & Sheard, J. (2008). Contributing student pedagogy. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(4), 194–212.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1473195.1473242

Howe, C, McWilliam, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance favours only the prepared mind: incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 96(1), 67–93.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604X15527

Lutteroth, C., & Luxton-Reilly, A. (2008). Flexible learning in CS2: a case study. In 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (NACCQ 2008). http://www.citrenz.ac.nz/conferences/2008/77.pdf.

Luxton-Reilly, A., Bertinshaw, D., Denny, P., Plimmer, B., & Sheehan, R. (2012). The Impact of Question Generation Activities on Performance. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 391–96.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157250

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–17.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–22.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Purchase, H., Hamer, J., Denny, P., & Luxton-Reilly, A. (2010). The quality of a PeerWise MCQ repository. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, 103, 137–46.

Rhodes, J. (2013). Using PeerWise to knowledge build and consolidate knowledge in nursing education. Southern Institute of Technology Journal of Applied Research. http://sitjar.sit.ac.nz/Pages/Publication.aspx?ID=120.

Ryan, B. (2013). Line up, line up: Uusing technology to align and enhance peer learning and assessment in a student centred foundation organic chemistry module. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2013/rp/c3rp20178c.

Sharp, A., & Sutherland, A. (2007). Learning gains…‘My (ARS)’: the impact of student empowerment using audience response systems technology on knowledge construction, student engagement and assessment. In The REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility, 29. http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/t2%20-%20great%20designs%20for%20assessment/in-class%20vs%20out-of-class%20work/Learning_gains_my_ARS.pdf.

Sykes, A, Denny, P. & Nicolson, L. (2011). PeerWise - the marmite of veterinary student learning. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on E-Learning, 820–30. Brighton UK: Academic Publishing Limited. http://academic-conferences.org/pdfs/ECEL_2011-Booklet.pdf.

Sykes, A. (2012). MCQ writing: a tricky business for students? | PeerWise-Community.org.” PeerWise-Community.org November 12. http://www.peerwise-community.org/2012/11/12/mcq-writing-a-tricky-business-for-students/.

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–76.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249