Supporting Graduate Teaching Assistants’ (GTA) Continual Professional Learning: The Benefits of Using Action Learning

Main Article Content

Claire Victoria Stocks

Abstract

This paper describes the design and delivery of a new programme of support for PhD students who act as Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) at a research intensive university. Although much attention has been paid to programmes that prepare GTAs for teaching, this scheme was intended to prepare them for continuing professional learning (CPL) about teaching. In this sense, then, the underpinning rationale for the scheme is different to most GTA programmes, and this has implications for the pedagogical approach taken. The design of the scheme was based on the premise that ‘learning in academia’ (i.e. learning about academic work and developing one’s practice) is different from ‘academic learning’, which the PhD participants are both familiar with and successful at (Trevitt, 2008). It follows then that the type of learning most likely to lead to development of practice, is a work-based, experiential approach undertaken by those in other practice-based professions like law, medicine and (non-HE) teaching. The paper describes the rationale and design of a development scheme which aims to prepare and equip GTAs for continuing professional learning during the PhD and on into their later careers. The benefits for the action learning approach are explored, both in terms of what it might offer participants, but also in terms of what it might offer to educational developers as learning set facilitators. 

Article Details

Section
Reflective Analysis Papers
Author Biography

Claire Victoria Stocks, University of Liverpool

Dr. Claire Stocks is Academic Development Lead in the Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at the University of Central Lancashire. Her research interests are in the development of novice academics, using work-based learning approaches in academic development and, more recently, in autoethnographic approaches to understanding academic development practice. E-mail: CStocks3@uclan.ac.uk

References

Archer, L. (2008). Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 385-403.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802211729

Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208-221.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.671771

Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Green, W., Hibbins, R., Houghton, L., & Ruutz, A. (2013). Reviving praxis: stories of continual professional learning and practice architectures in a faculty-based teaching community of practice. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 247-266.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.791266

Kahn, P. (2009). Contexts for teaching and the exercise of agency in early-career academics: perspectives from realist social theory. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 197-207.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106510

Kahn, P., Qualter, A., & Young, R. (2012). Structure and agency in learning: a critical realist theory of the development of capacity to reflect on academic practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 859-871.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.656078

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. London: Prentice Hall.

McAlpine, L., & Asghar, A. (2010). Enhancing academic climate: doctoral students as their own developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 167-178.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13601441003738392

McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (1999). Action Learning: a guide for professional, management & educational development. London: Kogan Page.

Monk, S., & McKay, L. (2017). Developing identity and agency as an early career academic: lessons from Alice. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(3).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1306532

Regan, J., & Besemer, K. (2009). Using action learning to support doctoral students to develop their teaching practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 209-220.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106536

Sharpe, R. (2000). A Framework for Training Graduate Teaching Assistants. Teacher Development, 4(1), 131-143.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530000200106

Stark, S. (2006). Using action learning for professional development. Educational Action Research, 14(1), 23-43.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600585244

Stocks, C., Trevitt, C., & Hughes, J. (2018). Exploring action learning for academic development in research intensive settings. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1417886

Trevitt, C. (2008). Learning in academia is more than academic learning: action research in academic practice for and with medical academics. Educational Action Research, 16, 495-515.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802445676

Trevitt, C., & Perera, C. (2009). Self and continuing professional learning (development): issues of curriculum and identity in developing academic practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 347-359.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050095

Winter, R. (2003). Contextualizing the Patchwork Text: addressing problems of coursework assessment in higher education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(2), 112-122.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329031000088978