Main Article Content
This paper describes the design and delivery of a new programme of support for PhD students who act as Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) at a research intensive university. Although much attention has been paid to programmes that prepare GTAs for teaching, this scheme was intended to prepare them for continuing professional learning (CPL) about teaching. In this sense, then, the underpinning rationale for the scheme is different to most GTA programmes, and this has implications for the pedagogical approach taken. The design of the scheme was based on the premise that ‘learning in academia’ (i.e. learning about academic work and developing one’s practice) is different from ‘academic learning’, which the PhD participants are both familiar with and successful at (Trevitt, 2008). It follows then that the type of learning most likely to lead to development of practice, is a work-based, experiential approach undertaken by those in other practice-based professions like law, medicine and (non-HE) teaching. The paper describes the rationale and design of a development scheme which aims to prepare and equip GTAs for continuing professional learning during the PhD and on into their later careers. The benefits for the action learning approach are explored, both in terms of what it might offer participants, but also in terms of what it might offer to educational developers as learning set facilitators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice has made best effort to ensure accuracy of the contents of this journal, however makes no claims to the authenticity and completeness of the articles published. Authors are responsible for ensuring copyright clearance for any images, tables etc which are supplied from an outside source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208-221.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Green, W., Hibbins, R., Houghton, L., & Ruutz, A. (2013). Reviving praxis: stories of continual professional learning and practice architectures in a faculty-based teaching community of practice. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 247-266.
Kahn, P. (2009). Contexts for teaching and the exercise of agency in early-career academics: perspectives from realist social theory. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 197-207.
Kahn, P., Qualter, A., & Young, R. (2012). Structure and agency in learning: a critical realist theory of the development of capacity to reflect on academic practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 859-871.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. London: Prentice Hall.
McAlpine, L., & Asghar, A. (2010). Enhancing academic climate: doctoral students as their own developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 167-178.
McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (1999). Action Learning: a guide for professional, management & educational development. London: Kogan Page.
Monk, S., & McKay, L. (2017). Developing identity and agency as an early career academic: lessons from Alice. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(3).
Regan, J., & Besemer, K. (2009). Using action learning to support doctoral students to develop their teaching practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 209-220.
Sharpe, R. (2000). A Framework for Training Graduate Teaching Assistants. Teacher Development, 4(1), 131-143.
Stark, S. (2006). Using action learning for professional development. Educational Action Research, 14(1), 23-43.
Stocks, C., Trevitt, C., & Hughes, J. (2018). Exploring action learning for academic development in research intensive settings. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
Trevitt, C. (2008). Learning in academia is more than academic learning: action research in academic practice for and with medical academics. Educational Action Research, 16, 495-515.
Trevitt, C., & Perera, C. (2009). Self and continuing professional learning (development): issues of curriculum and identity in developing academic practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 347-359.
Winter, R. (2003). Contextualizing the Patchwork Text: addressing problems of coursework assessment in higher education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(2), 112-122.