External Examination Invigilators’ (EEIs) Beliefs and Inference About Activities They Consider Important: Implication for Examination Policy

Main Article Content

Mark A Minott


The aim of this small-scale grounded approach qualitative study was to examine the beliefs of selected external examination invigilators (EEIs) and infer the kinds of activities they consider important. The importance of this study rested in the fact that there is a paucity of research which examines the role of EEIs at secondary, further and higher education levels. Therefore, it aids in filling a literary gap and gives them a ‘voice’ in the research literature. Study participants were five EEIs, working in a London secondary school. Purposeful convenience or opportunity sampling was used in their selection. Informal interviews and participant observation were the research methods used. The findings revealed the fact that beliefs of the EEIs guide how they rated their role and that maintaining examination intangibles and procedures is of high importance. Implication of the findings are discussed.

Article Details

Original Research
Author Biography

Mark A Minott, University of East London

Dr. Mark A. Minott has research interests in the areas of teacher education, music education, reflective teaching and the arts in education. His work can be found in journals such as: Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives (UK); Journal of Music, Technology and Education (UK); Professional Development in Education (UK); Canadian Journal of Education; International Journal of Music Education (USA); Teacher Education and Practice (USA); Australian Journal of Teacher Education; Journal of the University College of the Cayman Islands; Journal of Research on Christian Education (USA) and Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal (UK). Mark is also the author of several books: A Reflective Approach to Teaching Practicum Debriefing; Reflective teaching and...; Reflective Teaching: Properties, Tool, Benefits and Support; Reflection and Reflective Teaching: A Case study of four seasoned teachers in the Cayman Islands; and Cayman Islands Church School: To what extent Do Churches in the Cayman Islands influence Their Associated Schools?


Borg, M. (2001). Key concepts in ELT. Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186-188.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186

Bouville, M. (2008). The Obsession with exam fairness. Retrieved from: http://www.mathieu.bouville.name/education-ethics/Bouville-exam-fairness.pdf

Bush, T. (2002). Authenticity – reliability, validity and triangulation. In: A. Briggs, M. Coleman & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in Educational leadership and Management. London: Sage

Calderhead, J. (1992). The role of reflection in learning to teach. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective Teacher Education – Cases and Critiques (pp.139–46). New York: State University of New York.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory: Theories of qualitative research. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research theories and issues (pp. 195–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hoffman, B. (2015). The 5 most powerful self-beliefs that ignite human behaviour. Elsevier Connect. Retrieved from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/the-5-most-powerful-self-beliefs-that-ignite-human-behavior.

James, R. (2016). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1).
doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0015-0

Kings College London (2017). Job Description, Examination Invigilators. Retrieved from: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/campuslife/acservices/examinations/invigilators/invigilatorJD.pdf.

LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded Theory Methods and Qualitative Family Research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 837-857.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x

Liverpool Hope University (2014). Examination Regulations for Invigilators. Retrieved from: https://www.hope.ac.uk/media/liverpoolhope/contentassets/documents/studentsupport/studentadministration/studentadministrationrevised2014/media,40383,en.pdf

Lilley, M., Meere, J. & Barker, T. (2016). Remote Live Invigilation: A Pilot Study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 6.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.408

Minott, M. A. (2009). Reflection and reflective teaching: a case study of four seasoned teachers in the Cayman Islands. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.

Minott, M.A. (2010). Reflective teaching: Properties, tool, benefits and support. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

Minott. MA. (2012). Beliefs about teaching, teaching strategies and assessment methods: a case study of two piano teachers in Jamaica. Piano Pedagogy Forum 14(1), 176-185.

Mohmad Kahar, M. & Kendall, G. (2014). Universiti Malaysia Pahang examination timetabling problem: scheduling invigilators. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(2), 214-226.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.6

National Open College Network (2018). The Role of the Invigilator. Retrieved from:

National Union of Teachers (2006). Guidance on New Arrangements for Exam invigilation. Retrieved from: https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=ms-android-samsung,national union of teachers’ guidance on new arrangements for exam invigilation.

Newcastle University (2015). Examination Procedures and Guidelines for Assistant Invigilators. Retrieved from: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/students/progress/assets/documents/AssistantInvigilationProcedure.pdf.

Robson, C. (2007). How to do a research project, a guide for undergraduate students. Malden USA: Blackwell Publishing.

School teachers’ pay and conditions document, (2005). Section 4 guidance on changes to the document resulting from the national agreement. Retrieved from: http://Web archive.nationalatchives.gov.uk/20061023165013/ http://teacher net.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=

Shepherd, J. (2010, June 8). Exams come to the bedroom with new invigilation software. The guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/jun/08/exams-bedroom-invigilation-software
The workforce agreement monitoring group (2005). Invigilation resource pack-strategy overview and good practice guidance. Time for standards transforming the school workforce. Retrieved from: http://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownloa/NRT00652005PART2.pdf

The Ridgeway School & Sixth Form College (2016). Examination Policy. Retrieved from:
Thomas, C. (2012). How Underlying Beliefs Affect Behaviour (The Effects of Coaching). International Coach Academy. Retrieved from: http://coachcampus.com/coach-portfolios/research-papers/crystal-thomasresearch-paper-how-underlying-beliefs-affect-behavior-the-effects-of-coaching/

Vlaardingerbroek, B., Shehab, S. & Alameh, S. (2011). The problem of open cheating and invigilator compliance in the Lebanese Brevet and Baccalauréat examinations. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 297-302.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.03.002

Wikipedia, (2016). Exam invigilator. Retrieved from: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exam_invigilator