Screen-casting as a Technology-enhanced Feedback Mode

Main Article Content

Laura Claire Bissell

Abstract

Feedback by tutors to students on their written assignments is most frequently given via written comments and occasionally through a one-to-one tutorial. Recent developments in screen-casting technology have allowed students to receive feedback in MP4 video format where they are guided through their assignment visually and aurally by the tutor. This paper disseminates the pilot of screen-casting as a technology-enhanced feedback mode in a performing arts HEI. The aim of this limited but focussed research was to explore alternative ways of providing feedback to students and to engage with a range of approaches to learning and assessment. This paper reflects on the potential of screen-casting technology as a feedback mode for written work to provide extensive aural and visual feedback and suggests other possible applications in other areas of learning and teaching.

Article Details

Section
Original Research
Author Biography

Laura Claire Bissell, Royal Conservatoire of Scotland

Laura Bissell is a Lecturer in Contemporary Performance Practice at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. She is a visiting lecturer on the MRes in Creative Practices at Glasgow School of Art and has taught on the Transart Institute MFA in Berlin. Laura is Associate Editor of the Theatre, Dance and Performance Training journal.

References

Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education, Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350

Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

Harper, F., Green, H., & Fernandez-Toro, M., (2012). Evaluating the integration of Jing screencasts in feedback on written assignments. International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Austria.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icl.2012.6402092

HEFCE. (2009). The National Student Survey Results. Available at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/leaming/nss/data/ 2009/ (accessed 20 November 2016).

HEFCE. (2010). The National Student Survey Results. Available at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/leaming/nss/data/2010 (accessed 20 November 2016).

Henderson, M. & Phillips, M., (2014). Technology Enhanced Feedback on Assessment. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference, 2014, Adelaide, SA. http://acec2014.acce.edu.au/session/technology-enhancedfeedback-assessment

hooks, b., (2003). Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Routledge.

Hurford, D. & Read A. (2011). Do podcasts and screencasts enable or hinder independent learning? Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 30-38.

JISC Digital Media, (2016). Reasons to use a screencast. Retrieved January 2015. http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/infokit/screencasting/reasons-to-use-a-screencast

Law, R., (2013). Using Screencasts to Enhance Coursework Feedback for Game Programming Students. ITiCSE’13, July 1–3, 2013, Canterbury, England, UK.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2462476.2465610

Marriott, P., & Keong Teoh, L. (2012). Using Screencasts to Enhance Assessment Feedback: Students’ Perceptions and Preferences, Accounting Education 21(6), 583-598.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.725637

Mathieson, K. (2012). Exploring Student Perceptions of Audiovisual Feedback via Screencasting in Online Courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 26, 143-156.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2012.689166

Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp. 199-218.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Oehrli, J.A., Piacentine, J., Peters, A., & Nanamaker, B. (2011). Do Screencasts Really Work? Assessing Student Learning through Instructional Screencasts. ACRL Annual Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Pirie, I., Cordiner, S., & Triggs, J. (2011). Digital Spaces for Learning and Assessment in Art and Design. In Weiss, S.S. & Kelly, O. (Eds), Future Learning Spaces: Designs on eLearning. ART+DESIGN+ARCHTECTURE 2/2012, Aalto University, Helsinki, pp. 43-67.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2014). http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AssuringStandardsAndQuality/Pages/default.aspx. Retrieved 3rd July 2014.

Race, P., (2007). The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching. Oxon, Routledge.

Race, P., Brown, S., & Smith, B,. (2007). 500 Tips on Assessment: Second Edition. New York, Routledge.

Seror, J. (2012). Show me! Enhanced Feedback Through Screencasting Technology. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 104-116.
doi: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i1.1128

Surridge, P. (2006). The National Student Survey, 2005: Summary Report, Bristol: HEFCE.

Williams, J. & Kane, D. (2008). Exploring the National Student Survey: Assessment and Feedback Issues, York: HEA.

Williams, J. & Kane, D. (2009). Assessment and Feedback: Institutional Experiences of Student Feedback, 1996 to 2007. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(3), 264–286.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2009.00430.x