doi: 10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.233

Should We Teach Students How to Learn?

Sonia Moniz

Abstract


Student engagement and commitment are essential for successful science learning. At present, the design of course materials is usually primarily focused on disseminating as much information as possible within the limited amount of lecturing time available. This gives less emphasis on strategies to consolidate acquired information and to stimulate self-directed research into particularly interesting topics. Guiding students into forming a community of learners could enhance the efficiency of the learning process by sharing resources and discussing common difficulties. We set up an online chat room associated with the Parasitology module for Level 4 Life Sciences degree students, at the University of Dundee, which was run in parallel on Blackboard and on a restricted access Facebook group. Participation in the chat room was strictly voluntary, although students were advised it would be part of their formative training. The feedback results show the Facebook group was largely favoured over the Blackboard interface and that the students found the idea interesting, although engagement was mainly passive. Students reported that the major obstacle to participation was lack of time due to a heavy course workload, which also inhibited them in engaging in any further research on the themes proposed in the chatroom. Interestingly, a large majority of students indicated that they would like the lecturer’s participation in the chat room. These results indicate that students undervalue the role of self-directed formative training and collaborative learning in their studies, and calls into question the efficiency of current methodologies for preparing the next generation of autonomous and critical thinking scientists.


Keywords


student engagement; online community of learners; chat room; Facebook; formative training.

References


Armfield, S., Armfield, D., & Blocher, J. M. (2015). Online Collaboration and Social Networking. In R. Papa (Ed.), Media Rich Instruction: Connecting Curriculum to All Learners (pp. 189-202). Springer Science+Business Media New York.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00152-4_12

Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 188-196.

doi; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.002

Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘‘invisible’’ online student. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 147-155.

doi; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00086-6

Biggs, J. (2012). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 39-55.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642839

Bone, E., & McNichol, S. (2014). Students’ views on learning methods and Open Educational Resources in higher education. NUS report. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/nus-report.pdf

Casuso-Holgado M.J., Cuesta-Vargas A.I., Moreno-Morales N., Labajos-Manzanares M.T., Baron-Lopez F.J., & Vega-Cuesta M. (2013) The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Med Educ., 13: 33-10.1186/1472-6920-13-33.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-33

Collinson, S., & Halliwell, C. (2013). Understanding and promoting student engagement via online interactive tutorials - development of an internationally relevant environmental chemistry and health context based learning activity. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/tdg_simon_collinson.pdf

Condis, M. (2016). Teaching Today: Making Office Hours Matter. Inside Higher Ed [Blog post]. Retrived from: https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2016/11/01/how-convince-students-attend-office-hours-essay

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education,15(1), 3-8.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1624–1633.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003

Herrmann, K. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education 14(3) 175–187. Retrieved from: http://cul.au.dk/fileadmin/CUL/Dokumenter/Forskning/Kims_artikel_om_Cooperative_Learning.pdf

doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498035

High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education (HLGMHE) (2014). Report to the European commission on new modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/reports/modernisation-universities_en.pdf

Hrastinski, S., & Aghaee, N. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 451-464.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-011-9169-5

Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2012). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved from: http://blog.reyjunco.com/pdf/JuncoElavskyHeibergerTwitterCollaboration.pdf

Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53, 819-827.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.htm

Moll, R., & Nielsen, W. (2017). Development and validation of a social media and science learning survey. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(1), 14-30.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1161255

Rocca, K. (2010). Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185-213.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936

Rogers, K. (2013). Engaging nursing and midwifery students in life sciences. A presentation from the Health and Social Care Annual Conference. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/hsc21-engaging-nursing-and-midwifery_1.pdf

Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2013). Social media for teaching and learning. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from: http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/social-media-for-teaching-and-learning-2013-report.pdf

Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. D. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. EDUCASE Center for Applied Research (ECAR). Retrieved from: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers1006/rs/ers1006w.pdf

Snehansu, K. (2013). Important Do's and Don'ts for Social Media in Education. EdTechReview. Retrieved from: http://edtechreview.in/e-learning/552-dos-and-donts-for-social-media-in-education

Streeting, W., & Wise, G. (2009). Rethinking the values of higher education - consumption, partnership, community?, Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://www.sparqs.ac.uk/ch/F2%20Rethinking%20the%20Values%20of%20Higher%20Education.pdf

Tanner, K. (2013). Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 322–331.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115

Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in Higher Education at a time of change: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/what_works_final_report.pdf

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Lancaster University. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf

Tu, C., Blocher, M., & Roberts, G. (2008). Constructs for Web 2.0 learning environments: A theatrical metaphor. Educational Media International, 45, 253-269.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802588576

Weimer, M. (2015). Why Students Don’t Attend Office Hours. Faculty Focus, Higher Ed Teaching Strategies From Magna Publications [Blog post]. Retrieved from: http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/students-dont-attend-office-hours/


Full Text: PDF HTML
Article Views: 62

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

ISSN: 2051-9788